|
June 2009 Court dismisses Herald's application for stay of decision
(c) TheSun
KUALA LUMPUR (May 28, 2009) : The High Court today dismissed an application
by the Herald Catholic Weekly for an order to stay a Home Ministry decision
prohibiting the use of the word "Allah" in its publication.
High Court (Appellate and Special Powers Division) judge Lau Bee Lan made the
decision in her chambers after hearing submissions from counsel S. Selvarajah
and Porres Royan for the applicant, Archbishop Datuk Murphy Nicholas Xavier
Pakiam, and Senior Federal Counsel Munahyza Mustaffa and Andi Razalijaya A Dadi
for the Home Ministry, as the respondent.
"Under Section 9 of the Control and Restriction of the Propagation of
Non-Islamic Religions State Enactment, it is an offence for Muslims and
non-Muslims to publish or broadcast the word "Allah" in association with
non-Islamic religions.
"The judge held that if the stay was granted, this will tantamount to
supporting the offence to be committed if the Herald publication was to be
circulated to other states," Andi told reporters outside the chambers.
On April 24 this year, the applicant was given leave by the High Court to
quash the Home Ministry's decision of Jan 7, 2009 that the applicant's
publication permit for the period Jan 1, 2009 to Dec 31, 2009, was subject to
the condition that he be prohibited from using the word "Allah" in the Herald.
He was also granted leave to apply for nine declarations, including to
declare that the decision of the Home Ministry and the Government of Malaysia
was illegal and ultra vires the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984.
For full text, click here.
Priest of St John's Chapel, Triang
called in for questioning
by police
21.5.2009 Fr Jean Claude have been called in by the police
for an 'interview' at the Triang police station tomorrow, Friday (22/5/2009)...
Allegedly the instructions come from the Inspector General of Police (IGP)..
Last Sunday at 4pm, there was a special mass (prayer service)
at the St John's Chapel in Triang, i.e. that 83 year old chapel, that the Pahang
Government is threatening to demolish.
Lots of yellow coloured St John's Chapel parishioners were
there, and there were many more persons that came from other churches around the
country to show solidarity.
After mass, there was food and drinks served, and a little
talk by me on Freedom of Religion.
Now, the police has called in the Parish Priest, Fr Jean
Claude Lourdes, for questioning tomorrow.
What are the police doing? Trying to put some psychological
pressure to stop this desparate attempt by this community to save their 83-year
old chapel? I wonder..
Fr Jean Claude said that he will be going in to the Triang
police station at 2-30pm tomorrow (22/5/2009).
Why is this old chapel being targetted for destruction
suddenly...something is amiss.
Is there some corruption involved? Maybe the anti-corruption
body need to just investigate to be sure...
Or, is it just some form of 'punishment' being meted out to
the Catholic community in Triang? Why? Because of the problems that the Catholic
Church been causing - i.e. that Allah case, the conversion and religious rights
issues..
Maybe, it is because the church sits in that odd seat that
has repeatedly elected a DAP ADUN - but then the MP, is BN Minister Ismail Sabri
Yaakob...
Najib is from the Pekan Constituency, adjacent to the Bera
Constituency, and I believe our new PM should step in and ensure the continued
existence of this little chapel which has served the Triang community as shelter
during bad times...
source : http://charleshector.blogspot.com
Religion and human rights
Friday, 22 May 2009
source : ©The Nut Graph
By Ambiga Sreenevasan, Andrew Khoo and Zarizana Abdul Aziz
ON Tuesday, 28 April 2009, The Star published an article by
Dr Wan Azhar Wan Ahmad under the column IKIM's Views on the question of religion
and human rights in Malaysia. We the undersigned wrote a rebuttal. The Star has
chosen not to publish our rebuttal.
We would appreciate the opportunity of presenting a different
perspective to that expressed by Wan Azhar in respect of religion and human
rights in Malaysia. In so doing, we would stress that these are our personal
viewpoints and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organisation to which
we belong.
In the area of supranational laws, there is a move to advance
binding sets of principles that will guide nations. By [their] very nature,
these principles govern and restrict the conduct of the state.
Malaysia is no stranger to such principles. We are a party to
the Geneva Conventions and the Chemical Warfare Convention. These conventions
regulate the conduct of warfare by states and are very much part of human rights
laws. These laws are intended as a reflection of common decency, which guide
civilised nations to the extent that they override or circumscribe a state's
absolute freedom in the conduct of war. Indeed, this is only to be welcomed.
Are these rules new? Hardly. Such rules of war have been in
existence for several hundreds of years. For example, when the international
community questioned and condemned Israel's conduct in the Gaza War, we appealed
to international human rights and humanitarian laws.
for full text,
click here. |